Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 28
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 40
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 49
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 76
Requested RD1 redactions 2
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 13
Open sockpuppet investigations 52
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
The following accounts have probably been created by the IP vandal and should also be blocked:
Chrisahn (talk) 02:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 3
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 11
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 21 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Your own post on their talk page constitutes these issues Being discussed with the user.. If they ignore your concerns regarding the username and the COI please feel free to re-report. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 19:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request protection for the Wikipedia page [Kundalpur Jain Temple (Bade Baba)] due to persistent vandalism and misinformation being added by certain individuals. The temple is a highly significant religious site for followers of the Digambar sect of Jainism, yet the page has repeatedly been altered with incorrect information, likely motivated by sectarian bias.

Nature of the Issue

1.Misinformation on Managing Body: The temple is managed by Shri Digambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, but vandals have changed this to Shri Shwetambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, which is factually incorrect.

2.Religious and Cultural Sensitivity: The temple holds immense importance for the Digambar Jain community. The repeated alterations appear to stem from hate or jealousy, which disrespects the faith and beliefs of millions.

Evidence of Vandalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bade_Baba_Temple&diff=1270028436&oldid=1268410418

16:28, 9 January 2025 User12231

15:40, 17 January 2025 Uts v Jain

Request for Protection

Given the sensitivity of the topic and the repeated vandalism, I kindly request:

1. Semi-protection: Restrict edits to registered and confirmed users.

2. Long-term protection: Given the likelihood of continued attempts at misinformation, I request protection for an extended period.

This will help ensure that the article maintains its accuracy and neutrality, in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Protecting this page would not only prevent further disruption but also respect the sentiments of the Jain community, particularly the Digambar sect.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if further details or evidence are needed.

Sincerely,

Anonymous 92.99.127.127 (talk) 12:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Forgiving the format and length here, you do realize that you will be unable to edit the article if it gets semi-protected? Daniel Case (talk) 07:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 23:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent unilateral page moves. The title on this delete request is 2025 TikTok refugee crisis, someone moved the page to 2025 TikTok–REDnote migration and the talk page is Talk:2025 TikTok–REDnote mass migration. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

This might not need protection but needs a fix. I'm not knowledgeable about this so I've posted it here. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 05:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per our conversation about this on my talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 06:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of undue weight, not news material. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: I request semi-protecting this page again, this time permanently. The subject is prone to vandalism due to his controversies in recent years, and the recent events do not help either. The page has been temporarily semi-protected a few times but the problem still persists. Vgsa001 (talk) 12:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive editing. HorrorLover555 (talk) 12:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. As you last tried to do two weeks ago. Since this is a dispute over sourcing, you might want to bring in some editors who specialize in that to look at it. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request for semi-protectionfor atleast 6 months. High level of repeated IP and new account vandalism. Hbanm (talk) 13:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article barely edited at all, one disruptive edit in about 6 months. Lectonar (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit warring over infobox image. Noah, BSBATalk 17:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:1RR. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
I enforced 1RR (and will log it now), I do not think the protection is needed at this point. Ymblanter (talk) 22:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Week long edit warring by 2 parties. Reported at ANI here. Tarlby (t) (c) 18:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 18:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/AP Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since Gulf of Mexico is protected this page has been getting spillover from the "Gulf of America" crowd. I see at least four separate accounts adding in the proposed name in the last day. Rusalkii (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP along with WP:CRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inevitable vandalism given today's news. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since 1 December, a very persistent IP user, using about a dozen different IPs, has added the name of a non-notable individual to multiple sections of this list article. They have been particularly active during this past week; there is one unrelated, constructive IP edit since 15 Jan, the rest of the IP edits are all the same namedropping spam. bonadea contributions talk 20:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Template protection: High-risk template. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: change hasnt been made official Legzxy (talk) 21:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Doc Strange (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of massive amounts of unsourced fancruft by IP addresses since 17:55, 10 December 2024. Alith Anar 21:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Hello, IP user (46.112.80.216) continues to persistently remove valuable information from the lead of this article which summarizes this Lithuanian origin noble family's struggle for the independence of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and its crucial role in preserving the Grand Duchy of Lithuania as a separate state in the 16th and 17th centuries. Edits where this IP user (46.112.80.216) removed valuable content from the lead of the article: 1, 2, 3. In a short period of time this IP user removed the content three times already and by ignoring another experienced user Flat Out's request to stop doing this he performed the 3rd removal of content (see warning to him by user Flat Out here: 4), so clearly this IP user will not stop by himself. Consequently, I request administrators intervention with protection of this article in order to prevent further disruption by this IP user. -- Pofka (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Some vandalism persisting since previous period of semi-protection expired.

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Apparent IP vandalism [1][2][3]. Page eligible under WP:GS/PAGEANTS. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse. NightWolf1223 <Howl at meMy hunts> 23:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed after last protect expired. Multiple IPs, likely same person, copying article into its talk page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. CRBoyer 00:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite Full Protection: High level of persistent edit warring (vandalism). CricketXP (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Innacurate edits/maliciously made edits of Justin Chart's wikipedia page by user Rift. Label was changed from "Universal Music/records" to "Chart records" which is a defunct label. This page needs protection as asked by Justin Chart to preserve his prestige and works accurate. It is currently in semi protection and it should be fully protected. Angelbbkira (talk) 02:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: This page has been fully protected from creation since 2007, which was a very long time ago. I don't know why it should have permanent full protection for almost 18 years, that's just overkill. Anyways I wanted to do something with this category, connect it with Category:State-sponsored terrorism, either as a super-category or at least a category redirect. So yes, may someone please unprotect this page? AHI-3000 (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: No one edits it, 104.33.106.81 (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) No one edits it? You definitely are not correct. Every Wikipedia page receives at least one edit every so often. MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) This is clear data to the contrary, people DO edit the page, and the four edits this year are evidence enough to argue against any lowering. Two Extended-Confirmed editors disruptively blanking the page for "nothing-ness" and restoring a moment later? I can't imagine the disruption of shit edits if the page protection were to be lowered. Zinnober9 (talk) 21:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined Not a valid reason for lowering protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


include "convicted felon" in the first sentence of description and last sentence of introduction, as well as details of conviction to be added in general. available sources: public court announcements/ various media Mystique9558 (talk) 13:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined There's an ongoing discussion at Talk:Donald Trump#Proposal to supersede consensus #50 which hasn't been closed yet. Lectonar (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Change part of the final sentence in the third paragraph from "becoming the second president in U.S. history following Grover Cleveland to serve to nonconsecutive terms." to "becoming the second president in U.S. history following Grover Cleveland to serve two nonconsecutive terms." Phyxiseagle (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Already done. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Done. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that... (Simply a factual edit/addition) "Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is a convicted felon, a American politician, media personality, and businessman who has served as the 47th president of the United States since 2025. ) . 64.121.234.225 (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: @64.121.234.225: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Declined See two sections above. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

4 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Message box (request) 2025-01-07 21:25 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Module:Disambiguation (request) 2025-01-18 20:46 Fully protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2023-09-01: "Upping to full protection as now used by Module:Pagetype"
Fadlo R. Khuri (request) 2025-01-20 18:30 Fully protected, expires 2025-01-21 at 14:24:38 UTC (log) Protected by Randykitty on 2025-01-19: "Edit warring / content dispute"
MediaWiki:Robots.txt (request) 2025-01-20 21:07 MediaWiki page (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
10 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-12-29 20:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-01-06 03:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-01-12 14:40 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Module:Infobox military conflict (request) 2025-01-12 21:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-10-08: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Infobox military conflict/styles.css (request) 2025-01-12 21:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2019-07-02: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Template:Db-meta (request) 2025-01-15 03:05 Template-protected (log) Modified by NeilN on 2015-11-18: "per request"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-01-15 19:22 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Wikipedia:WikiProject/Popular pages config.json (request) 2025-01-17 19:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-09-28: "protect at TE level"
Template:Doi (request) 2025-01-18 19:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Jo-Jo Eumerus on 2016-08-18: "Highly visible template: Protecting admin inactive, no need for high protection given the only moderately high usage"
Template:Authority control (request) 2025-01-19 15:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.

Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [4]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

330+ article creations with zero deletions. Have run into this editor's creations in New Page Review and do not have to do repairs; infoboxes, categories, wikilinks, short descriptions, talk pages, etc. are all in place. This editor does not need to be in the new pages feed. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


Fixing typos (乛-乛) (talk) 10:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done, your username violates our policies as was stated on your talk page. Feel free to re-request when you have changed your name and we will give your request the appropriate consideration. Primefac (talk) 12:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Fixing typos Clubette (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Sorry, I don't think you have enough experience for this yet, and the exchange above does not inspire confidence. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Why not? Clubette (talk) 06:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
  1. You only barely meet the minimum criteria, with exactly 255 non-automated edits.
  2. Most of your edits are without edit summaries
  3. You didn't respond to the message on your talk page at all until it was brought up here.
All of these things collectively fail to convince me that you have enough experience to be granted AWB access. And nothing you say here is likely to convince me otherwise. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

[edit]

Reason for requesting confirmed rights to edit and correct information on wikipedia Maximus O (talk) 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! Beeblebrox Beebletalks 19:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey, I would like to apply for the NPR rights. As I have created more than 50 pages and I'm actively involved in reviewing drafts since last week of December 2024, you can check my reviewed articles here and the articles I putted up for deletion can be seen here. My primary focus are the articles related to Women, Politics, India, Poetry, Writers and Indian activists. I do sometime revert bad faith edits. I will contribute to the Wikipedia with NPR rights, same as I have contributed through the AFC Reviewer rights. Thanks and Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

As a wikipedia contributor, I have created several wikipedia articles and committed several edits to improve the wikipedia articles. I would love to contribute as a New page reviewer and it will help me to expand my contributions to Wikipedia. Ensconce (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 22:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Joe Roe declined your last request for NPR just 18 days ago, and I haven't seen you take on any of his suggestions such as applying for WP:AFC reviewer rights. Please wait at least two months and consider participating at venues such as WP:AFD to gain more experience with our content and deletion-related processes before applying for this user right again. Fathoms Below (talk) 05:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]

Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Leaning towards no, mainly on account of a lack of demonstrated need, but willing to be overruled or persuaded otherwise. Primefac (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
As an example; I'd be able to close this RM if there is no consensus, as I did the previous that lacked consensus, but I wouldn't be able to if there was consensus. The one I closed had sat in the backlog for almost two months. CNC (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
@CommunityNotesContributor: Feel free to close some more RMs even if you'd need to request assistance at WP:RM/TR to implement some of them. See WP:RMNAC. And in other instances where you would use this permission to make a swap or move a page without leaving a redirect, just ask at WP:RM/TR for now. I basically agree with Primefac, so I'll mark as  Not done. I'd consider granting this when you've made more like 10 technical requests. SilverLocust 💬 06:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@SilverLocust: Understood, thanks for explaining. I hadn't really considered using RMTR to implement an RM closure, but in future I won't shy away from such closures that require it. On a side note, the word "several" would be well placed at WP:PMCRITERIA to describe "Participation in requested moves and move reviews," , as I read this as simply plural/multiple; and with approval otherwise being at the discretion of an admin, it wouldn't change much. It could help to reduce backlogged requests such as mine in future. CNC (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Ironically I've now made 10 technical requests for page moves. 5 more at RMTR (diff1 diff2), another four via ANI ([6] diff) to avoid time wasting and as preventative measure to reduce requests at RMTR (diff), and including first ever request (diff), that makes 10. Looks like I could have cleaned up this mess made by a single editor given the opportunity. CNC (talk) 15:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Your three most recent RMTR requests were all contested. I think that disqualifies you from this permission for a long while. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Um, exactly how long? Because I'll still be involved in RMs and at RMTR! Intrisit (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, I'm requesting this right to protect Wikipedia from Vandals. By the way the 1 of the 2 revisions (both not accepted) in Curry was unaccepted without any reason and other maybe due to some misunderstanding by the reviewer of the WP:NOINDICSCRIPT & both were good faith.Although I am look as a newcomer, but this is a clean start account. If there is any other objection, I'll try to be explainable for it. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 11 days and has 57 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 00:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done You've only had an account for about 11 days, which isn't enough of a track record to demonstrate that you routinely edit. Furthermore, I saw in this edit that you want to become extended confirmed and a template editor "as soon as possible" which gives the impression that you want to collect hats. I don't feel comfortable with granting you this user right at this time. Fathoms Below (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Alright, but I'm not collecting hats (to show off). Well I've always wanted to be a template editor & I was extended confirmed in my old account. (4yrs and 1071 edits before I clean started) Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm sorry if I am offensive. But the point is that I never had,have or will have the intention to collect hats. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
By "as soon as possible" I meant to fulfill my desire to contribute Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
  • please don't think that I'm doing this to change your mind. I'm just removing that show off tag.
Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

I had the PCR userright, which was granted last year (request). While I had the flag, I didn't use it very much, so I requested the removal of the flag, which was granted. Since then, I keep finding myself looking at Special:PendingChanges and wanting to mark edits as reviewed. (Note that I also have rollback perms.) Thank you for your time and consideration! Relativity ⚡️ 01:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Fathoms Below (talk) 04:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at PendingChanges, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the criteria for its use, especially in regard to BLP and countering vandalism. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. Additionally, I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions, and finally – as for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

To review changes on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. — W.andrea (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. Drdr150 (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 197 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 19:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I just wanted to leave a note that the user has today been auto reported on AIV for tripping edit filter 1311 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Drdr150). Another admin User:Daniel Case looked at the report and believed it to be a false positive. I have just been looking at the contributions too, and also looked like a false positive to me, but then I noted this request, and thought that I should at least mention it here. TigerShark (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
What I was saying was that while I believed it to be a false pos, I was not familiar enough with what I was reviewing to say so with the highest degree of confidence. Daniel Case (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm not 100% sure what that edit filter is trying to tell us, but I can't see any serious issue with those edits either. Will proceed with  Checking... if they are otherwise qualified for this user right. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done With barely 200 mainspace edits, you are right on the line for when we will even consider granting this. I think you are off to a decent start in combatting vandalism, but I think you need a bit more experience before this is granted. I notice someone suggested that you might want to use TWINKLE for this and I agree fully with that, it's a great tool for helping users interested in removing vandalism and warning disruptive editors and can help you easily get the kind of experience looked for when evaluating these requests. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Seems to be looking for matches to a old reported sock (Special:AbuseFilter/1311)(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Hamish_Ross/Archive, but is a likely source of false positives. TigerShark (talk) 11:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 32
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 15
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 722
    Templates for deletion 129
    Categories for deletion 2,587
    Wikipedia files for discussion 135
    All redirects for discussion 435
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 5
    Possible copyright violations 22
    All articles proposed for deletion 248
    All files proposed for deletion 8
    Unsorted AfD debates 2
    All files with the same name on Commons 7
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 365
    Unknown copyright status 32
    Unknown source 22
    No non-free use rationale 1
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 25

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,273
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 448
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,288
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,654 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 6,065 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,335 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 40,381 0.58

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,268 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 538,358 7.75
    All articles lacking sources 69,908 1.01
    All unreferenced BLPs 20 0
    All articles needing additional references 477,343 6.88
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,650 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,619 1.52
    All articles with dead external links 304,935 4.39

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 135 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 18 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,238 0.02
    All articles to be split 823 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 1 -
    Stub categories 19,288 -
    All uncategorized pages 832 0.01
    All orphaned articles 54,401 0.78
    All articles needing copy edit 2,310 0.03
    All articles with style issues 19,237 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,768 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,556 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 472
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,286
    All accuracy disputes 15,788
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 0
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 3
    All articles to be expanded 66,020

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.